NEYLAN ARCHITECTURE
  • HOME
  • PRACTICE
    • ABOUT
    • PEOPLE
  • URBAN DESIGN
  • ARCHITECTURE
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT

News

In addition to progress reports on work we are undertaking, this section of our
site provides commentary on topical issues where we want to express our
​opinion. In this way, our attitudes are revealed.

TZU CHI COMMUNITY CENTRE

9/12/2022

 
Our recently completed Tzu Chi community centre promotional video. This building will house a community meeting and activity space, classrooms and a child care centre.

BACK TO THE FUTURE - PART 3

30/11/2020

 
Alternative housing types for best-practice urban design 
In ‘Part 2’ of the case study of the ‘Town of Seaside’ in Marcoola, Qld, our comparative analysis suggested that abandoning the original best-practice master plan strategies included in Stages 2 & 3 (and its regulatory code), had a negative impact on urban quality outcomes for the area. In ‘Part 3’, we highlight housing types (discarded in the ‘As Built’ version) that promote the implementation of the principles advocated by the new Planning Amendment (2020); QDesign: Principles for Good Urban Design in Queensland (2018); and Model Code for Neighbourhood Design: A code for reconfiguring a lot (2020). Two types stand out: T3 - Detached Laneway Housing and T5 - Adaptable Townhouse (in red, Fig. 1, below).
Picture
Type T3 - Detached Laneway Housing

This type allows for multiple variations (Fig. 2), and is particularly effective at promoting high levels of walkability within interconnected road and pedestrian networks. The hierarchical arrangement (front streets and internal laneways), ensures streets are active public space, while service laneways have a more ‘private’ role accommodating garages, driveways and refuse areas. It also facilitates dedicated on-street parking which provides adequate shading and reduces driveway crossovers. Overall, a more walkable and safer environment is achieved, resulting in enhanced liveability and highly improved architectural and urban amenity (Fig. 3).
Picture
Picture
Type T5 – Adaptable Townhouses

This type (Fig. 4), is ideal for a ‘best practice’ planning strategy offering multiple housing options through a variety of densities and uses.
Picture
The adaptability of the home-office or a home-shop type has several advantages, including:
  • Provides a wide range of housing alternatives for a wide range of dwellers.
  • Allows genuine mixed-use within a mid/low-density, low-rise environment.
  • Promotes streets character through active frontages and a variety of uses.
  • Provides sustainable home/office/work alternatives in an expanding home-based labour market.
  • Assists in the consolidation of neighbour centres through the controlled agglomeration of mixed uses.

To ensure the proper use of these types, and the proper implementation of best-practice planning principles, the master plan included a comprehensive ‘Urban & Architectural Regulatory Code’ (Fig. 5).  
Picture

BACK TO THE FUTURE - PART 2

30/11/2020

 
 Best-practice vs. formulaic planning 

In ‘Part 1’ of the case study analysis of the beachside community of ‘Town of Seaside’, we discussed how this 2000 staged master plan pioneered walkable neighbourhood strategies that have just recently been adopted by Queensland Government legislation. The fact that only Stage 1 was completed (Figure 1), provided us with an opportunity to conduct a comparative study of Stages 2 & 3 (‘master planned’ vs. ‘as built’). In this study we examine how abandoning the original Stages 2 & 3 planning (and its regulatory code), affected the urban quality of the area.

The study is structured around the urban design principles highlighted in Part 1, as showcased in the Planning Amendment (2020) and the Model Code (2020) assessment benchmarks.

A. Multiple housing options:
As shown in Figure 2, Stages 2 & 3 of the original master plan included a variety of densities and uses. It also offered seven ‘missing middle’ building types in the shape of medium-density apartments; attached dwellings and flexible home-office/shop alternatives. In contrast, in the area formerly occupied by Stages 2 & 3, the traditional suburban ‘detached dwelling’ (light blue) became the overwhelmingly predominant type. 

Picture
This tendency is confirmed by Table 1, below: 
  • Detached (312) and semi-detached dwellings (36), represent 71% of units built so far in former Stage 2 & 3 areas.
  • The original master plan envisioned 256 of these types for the same area, i.e. only 36% of the proposed total of 704.
  • Interestingly, the original master plan was able to achieve a total of 704 dwelling units in the same area where just 487 have now been built.

Given open space meterage did not substantially change in the ‘as built’ scenario, this suggests that the lack of housing variety (or options) also had a negative effect on the development’s yield.
Picture
B. Community-oriented neighbourhood structure

Deviating from the original master plan, no central mixed-use neighbourhood hub was planned for the area formerly occupied by Stages 2 & 3 (Fig. 3). The Stage 1 neighbourhood centre remained the only real neighbourhood centre. 
Picture
C. Walkability
​

The extensive Stage 1 footpath network that linked the community and ensured streets functioned as active public space, was not extended into the area formerly occupied by Stages 2 & 3. It was replaced by a traditional suburban layout characterised by fragmentation, poor connectivity and reduced walkability (Fig. 4). 
Picture
D. Interconnected road network
​

The original interconnected grid avoiding cul-de-sacs was disregarded (Fig 5. ‘Planned (Stage 1)’). Its hierarchical arrangement of public streets and semi-private laneways was ignored, resulting in a traditional suburban layout characterised, among others, by poor connectivity; cul-de-sacs (Fig. 5, ‘As built’); the predominance of ‘garage architecture’; and the degradation of the street as public space.
Picture
E. Open space
​

Ignoring and reducing both the footpath and the interconnected road networks, not only restricted walkability and accessibility to open spaces, but limited view corridors and overall amenity (Fig. 6). 
Picture
F. Dedicated on-street parking
Dedicated on-street parking was disregarded which, in addition to a reduced footpath network, limits the street’s capacity to perform as active public space, degrading the overall quality of the streetscape. 
Picture
Conclusions

Our comparative study suggests that abandoning the original planning principles for formulaic subdivision strategies, had a negative impact in the overall quality of the development of Stages 2 & 3. Major shortcomings include: poor walkability; reduced interconnectivity; degraded street activity; limited diversity; a fragmented neighbour structure; and a lack of housing options. Paradoxically, this traditional planning approach also resulted in a reduced development yield. In our third instalment we will examine key building types included in the ‘Town of Seaside Master Plan’.

BACK TO THE FUTURE - PART 1

24/10/2020

 
Pioneering the walkable neighbourhoods of the 21st century  

On 28 September, the Planning (Walkable Neighbourhoods) Amendment Regulation 2020 became the legal instrument that controls the assessment benchmarks for lot reconfiguration in Queensland. This milestone was the result of a long process that included landmark government initiatives such as QDesign: Principles for good urban design in Queensland (2018) and Model Code for neighbourhood design: A code for reconfiguring a lot (2020). The new assessment benchmarks are aimed at promoting more sustainable neighbourhoods that are walkable; healthier; better connected; better serviced; and less car dependant. Key changes for new subdivisions include:
  • Provision of a range of housing options for multiple family and work requirements
  • Improved connectivity through traditional grid-like road patterns that avoid dead ends
  • Reduced block size (max. 250m) to maximise pedestrian circulation
  • Provision of adequately shaded footpaths on both sides of the road for enhanced connectivity
  • Open space recreation areas within a 400m walking distance of residential areas

​These changes are great news for us at NA. We have been advocating this new kind of urbanism (and applying these planning principles) for over 20 years. In fact, back in 2000 we pioneered the ‘walkable neighbourhood’ with the master plan for the ‘Town of Seaside’, a 45 Ha development 110km north of Brisbane (Fig.1). The plan implemented a balanced planning approach that envisioned a walkable community without excluding the automobile. 
Picture
​The staged development was comprised of approximately 1,400 dwellings. Only Stage 1 of the master plan was completed (Fig. 2) and the land encompassing Stages 2 and 3 was later developed separately. 
Principles The 2000 master plan showcases key Planning Amendment and Model Code assessment benchmarks, including:

A. Multiple housing options
Seven building types are offered, including flexible home-office and home-shop alternatives. 
Picture
​B. Walkable neighbourhoods
A clear neighbourhood structure is defined by a centre and an edge (Fig. 4). Residents are within a 500m walk from neighbourhood centres via an extensive two-sided footpath network that ensures streets are an active public space. 
Picture
C. Interconnected road network
The network’s gridded layout avoids cul-de-sacs, providing full connectivity and walkability. Its hierarchical arrangement ensures streets are dedicated to the public realm, while service laneways accommodate garages, driveways and refuse areas (Fig 5). This results in highly improved architectural, urban and pedestrian amenity. 
Picture
D. Open space accessibility
The extensive footpath network ensures the open space network is within a 400m walking distance from residential areas (Fig. 6). Both networks converge at open space corridors that maximise ocean views and overall amenity. 
Picture
E. Dedicated on-street parking
Landscaped berms with trees planted every 15m provide shading for footpaths and on-street parking (Fig. 7). This arrangement promotes more active and safer streets for pedestrians and cyclists, and reduces driveway crossovers.  
Picture
F. A regulatory code
The master plan included a comprehensive ‘Urban & Architectural Regulatory Code’ to ensure the proper implementation of planning principles.
Picture
Conclusions
Twenty years ago, the ‘Town of Seaside’ master plan pioneered the urban design strategies recently implemented by Queensland Government planning legislation. This makes Stage 1, the only completed stage, a perfect case study of the benefits of these strategies. Given the land encompassing Stages 2 and 3 was developed separately, in Part Two we will examine the consequences of discarding the regulatory code in the development of the remaining sites.
Picture

URBAN RENEWAL OF THE EAGLE JUNCTION STATION PRECINCT: THE POTENTIAL

23/10/2020

 
​The precinct’s renewal could provide numerous benefits associated with integrated and sustainable land-use and transport planning. While respecting the existing character of a traditional low-density area, this type of adaptive redevelopment could improve its liveability by renewing stagnant portions of the urban fabric; providing better transport alternatives; offering new housing options; and creating new opportunities for business, recreation and community interaction. it would also be consistent with post-Covid planning strategies aimed at stimulating the development of more autonomous and sustainable local neighbourhood centres. 

You can read more about the Town of Seaside as part of our Urban Design series on Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/neylan-architecture

​
Picture

EAGLE JUNCTION STATION: A CHANCE FOR GENUINELY INTEGRATED LAND-USE AND TRANSPORT PLANNING

22/10/2020

 
​Eagle Junction Station precinct presents a unique opportunity for the true integration of sustainable land-use and transport planning. The precinct’s renewal could further boost the new high-frequency transit network now taking shape through the ‘Cross River Rail’ and ‘Brisbane Metro’ initiatives. The implementation of balanced mixed-use development intensification, in coordination with best-practice transit strategies, could transform Eagle Junction into a genuine rail-oriented precinct. A consolidated northern inner-city rail-oriented corridor would offer an alternative to unsustainable suburban fringe expansion and automobile dependency. 

You can read more about our Urban Design series on Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/neylan-architecture
Picture
Picture

RENEWING OUR INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN

25/9/2020

 
As part of Neylan Architecture’s commitment to new ideas in an evolving urban environment, we are welcoming back Ricardo Madrid to the NA team. Ricardo completed a Master in Urban & Regional Planning at UNE which, in addition to his 20-year experience in the practice of architecture in SEQ, affords him a unique multi-disciplinary perspective to urban and architectural topics. 
Picture
His recruitment is part of a renewed strategy to allow the practice to further expand its 30-year exploration of place and city-making issues. As part of this process we will be conducting a series of design research exercises on topics such as: ‘Subdivisions and master planning for 21st century SEQ’; ‘Sustainable mammoths: shopping centre readaptation’; and ‘Post-Covid: the age of polycentric development’, among others.

The series will begin with a case study examining Eagle Junction, a neighbouring rail station (see image below). Recent plans for transit-oriented developments (TODs) along the inner-Brisbane northern railway corridor (in red) at Albion and Toombul, have revived interest in genuinely integrated land-use and transport planning. 

Our first design exercise examining Eagle Junction Station’s potential for TOD, is coming soon!
Picture

SUNSHINE COAST DESIGN

11/6/2020

 
Picture
Great to see Sunshine Coast Council heavily promoting appropriate and successful design standards in its beautiful region. We just received this luxurious coffee table book from Council and we are chuffed to see our Town of Seaside in Marcoola, featuring prominently in a double page spread. This neighbourhood design instigated by us in the late 90’s has matured as we had hoped. We are gratified to see the attributes we fought hard to implement back then are now starting to become mainstream in the development community and align with design principles and key values that Sunshine Coast Council want to see included in future development.

  • Creating rear lanes & removing garages from street fronts
  • Promoting accessory units above garages in the rear lanes – not subdividing into smaller lots for separate dwellings
  • Mandating a mix of dwelling types and densities in proximity to each other
  • Placing public space at the centre of the neighbourhood where highest dwelling density occurs
  • Planning interconnected walkable streets
Picture
Unfortunately, the full scheme proposed in our urban plan was not fully realised and three quarters of the land flagged for development was sold to a major developer who turned their back on the design principles and instead separated the scheme with a 2 meter high fence.  You can read more about this in a previous post.

Our inclusion was selected as part of a “collaboration between residents, design professionals, planners, professional associations and community groups of the Sunshine Coast who shared what they loved and valued about the region”.  The release of the Design Guide by the Sunshine Coast Council coincides with their design series program which is running until December this year.

You can view or purchase the book at Folio Books or via the Sunshine Coast Council website  

​
https://www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/Development/Development-Tools-and-Guidelines/Sunshine-Coast-Design/News-and-Events/SCD-Book-Media-Launch
Picture
Picture

A NECKLACE OF PARKLANDS

9/10/2019

 
Picture
Brisbane City Council’s announcement that Victoria Park Golf Course will be closed and the area converted to active parkland is a positive initiative worthy of our support. The proposal is as yet embryonic. Early detail can be accessed on Council’s website here:

https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/things-to-see-and-do/council-venues-and-precincts/parks/brisbane%E2%80%99s-biggest-new-park-victoria-park-vision

It is also gratifying to see that the COMMITTEE FOR BRISBANE has taken the initiative to survey its membership for ideas and has compiled worthwhile feedback to the Council. This feedback can be viewed here:

https://bda.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/C4B_Victoria-Park-Submission-27.9.19.pdf
​

It is worth noting that, some years ago when the Committee was then known as the BRISBANE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, this Group facilitated a similar urban design workshop: the exercise at that time focused on ways to integrate the as yet unbuilt Inner City Bypass into the fabric of the city. 
Picture
Both then and now a significant initiative was/is suggested. To quote from the latest feedback document this initiative involves:

 “…stitching together the city centre and one of Brisbane’s greatest assets…” .

“…green space could extend across parts of the ICB to stitch together the two parts of the park…”

So, in doing this we gain not only a new park but also we make it accessible to a much wider community who can access it on foot.
​
Such an initiative is not unprecedented, having been undertaken in many parts of the world at various scales. Have a look at Boston’s “Big Dig”, Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon and Detroit’s I-696 Pedestrian Plaza. These are just a few examples  of how the negative impact of traffic arteries can be overcome for the city’s benefit
Picture
​In our instance the Inner City Bypass happens to run through a valley between higher grounds on either side. This makes it relatively simple to create a “land bridge” across the traffic artery: the parkland flowing down from Gregory Terrace can then link with and be part of the new Victoria Park. In this way the historic Spring Hill neighbourhood gains the benefit of direct pedestrian access into the new parkland. Similarly Herston and surrounding neighbourhoods gain enhanced accessibility without the need for vehicle trips.
Picture
Extending our thinking to a broader scale it is possible to conceive of the CBD as being enveloped by A NECKLACE OF CONNECTED PARKLANDS. This necklace can extend from the City Botanic Gardens up the sub-tropical boulevard that is Albert Street, through Roma Street Parklands and into the new Victoria Park. Further future initiatives could then facilitate a linkage through Fortitude Valley to New Farm Park.  
Picture
A pedestrian journey such as this would amount to a significant lifestyle enhancement for our local population as well as creating a wonderful way for visitors to experience and explore our city
 
 
It is interesting to note that Sydney has begun studying its own “green necklace of cultural landscapes”  - an initiative remarkably similar to what we are proposing in Brisbane. The Sydney proposal can be viewed at this link:

https://www.foreground.com.au/cities/the-green-necklace-a-new-perspective-on-sydney-harbours-parklands/
​

As our city matures it is important that we find new ways of making the most of all its assets.

GOLDILOCKS PRINCIPLE

24/1/2017

 
Picture
Picture
We think it is worthwhile passing on thoughts from an insightful posting on an urban design discussion forum we subscribe to. Michael Mehaffy was the author.
To clarify, the “Goldilocks Principle” is the principle that what is good at one scale may not be good – may in fact be very harmful - at another. For many things, as in the goldilocks fable there is a “just right” scale.

To use a common example – if we take aspirin one tablet may be good, and two may be twice as good. But one hundred is not one hundred times as helpful!

The same can be said about many urban phenomena, for example density. A doubling from say 15 units to the Hectare to 30 units to the Hectare can generally be a very beneficial thing, making public transit viable and bringing many other benefits at the neighbourhood scale. But 300 units to the Hectare is not beneficial – high density of this magnitude brings with it many negatives.

Mehaffy’s final quotable quote “… the three most important factors in urbanism (with apologies to the real estate agents) are scale, scale and scale !...”

Anyway a number of years ago we discussed this same topic of density at length in a previous posting on our website: we thought it might be worth re-visiting here
​
http://www.neylan.com.au/conversation/inner-city-brisbane-a-few-comments-on-height-and-density


<<Previous

    Categories

    All
    IDEAS/CONCEPTS
    OUR BUILDINGS
    URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Neylan Architecture Pty Ltd
42 Bridge Street, Albion, 4010
Brisbane QLD, AUSTRALIA

07 3857 2044
[email protected]
  • HOME
  • PRACTICE
    • ABOUT
    • PEOPLE
  • URBAN DESIGN
  • ARCHITECTURE
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT